- Impact
- 9,578
Patrick Bet-David founder of Valuetainment acquired VT.com from Brent Oxley.
I think VT could serve as a re-brand. It's a lot more memorable than Valuetainment. It also saves a lot of money in terms of marketing.I'm glad for him to be proud; on the few interviews I've seen, he seems competent.
To play devil's advocate, however... Other than annoying the State of Vermont, is there any downside to this? Is there such a thing as too short of a domain name. While long, and some may drop the e, Valuetainment is a knowable brand. VT is barely an acronym, since the original is styled as one word. Sure they can advertise it and make it known, but it doesn't mean relate by itself. Yes, it probably has backlinks, but they are often corrected and could drop off over time; I doubt the backlinks are worth millions -- particularly when Valuetainment.com probably had plenty of its own.
I never heard of it and without prior knowledge or recognition I can say that it's a terrible name, absolute bottom-of-the-barrel branding. There are few domains that would serve as a downgrade to this monstrosity.While long, and some may drop the e, Valuetainment is a knowable brand. VT is barely an acronym, since the original is styled as one word.
yeah but why are you telling us, we're trying to talk domainsEdit just to clarify a bit, I don't care about ideology, it's about dishonesty / being a massive shameless cloutshark / this guy would take your mother's last $10. Total used car salesman vibes, if you know you know.
Yup. He did an interview with Andrew Tate once (whom is facing serious charges for sex trafficking). So he platforms traffickers, and he did a stupid tweet offering Tucker Carlson $100 million (which he obviously does not have).This guy sucks, complete grifter / scammy MLM freak based on everything I've seen from him (which is far too much). Super disingenuous, but he knows the slop that his audience craves. The less attention these guru weirdos get, the better. Great name tho. Huge upgrade!
Edit just to clarify a bit, I don't care about ideology, it's about dishonesty / being a massive shameless cloutshark / this guy would take your mother's last $10. Total used car salesman vibes, if you know you know.
Agreed, valuetainment is one of the worst names I’ve ever heard. He probably thought it was so witty and creative when he made it. And the logo looks like a clip art lion lmao.I never heard of it and without prior knowledge or recognition I can say that it's a terrible name, absolute bottom-of-the-barrel branding. There are few domains that would serve as a downgrade to this monstrosity.
Agreed with this.I'm glad for him to be proud; on the few interviews I've seen, he seems competent.
To play devil's advocate, however... Other than annoying the State of Vermont, is there any downside to this? Is there such a thing as too short of a domain name. While long, and some may drop the e, Valuetainment is a knowable brand. VT is barely an acronym, since the original is styled as one word. Sure they can advertise it and make it known, but it doesn't mean relate by itself. Yes, it probably has backlinks, but they are often corrected and could drop off over time; I doubt the backlinks are worth millions -- particularly when Valuetainment.com probably had plenty of its own.
Video chatting with some guy who traficked women and forced them to do work? Tate also said he moved to Romania “because the laws were relaxed.” But sure, tell me more about how it’s perfectly normal and ok to have a chat with someone like this.Cry harder. And no I don't like Tate, but I also don't like people that go around trying to be all high and mighty about someone having a chat on a video with someone.
Wonder how much? $3M?Patrick Bet-David founder of Valuetainment acquired VT.com from Brent Oxley.